<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Country For Old Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polytropos.wordpress.com/2005/08/06/no-country-for-old-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polytropos.wordpress.com/2005/08/06/no-country-for-old-men/</link>
	<description>A blog of twists and turns</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. K. Coffman</title>
		<link>http://polytropos.wordpress.com/2005/08/06/no-country-for-old-men/#comment-3254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C. K. Coffman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polytropos.wordpress.com/2005/08/06/no-country-for-old-men/#comment-3254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nate, 

The local library finally got this book in stock ($25! Who does McCarthy think he is?  Faulkner?  Melville?), so I am finally free to look at your blog again.  I agree with almost all of your evaluation, except your argument that the end of the Moss family so long before the end of the book was a bad structural decision (or do I misread you?).  Yes, the book falls apart after Llewelyn&#039;s wife dies, but with that ending, it would have been just a potboiler.  Still, what McCarthy gives us doesn&#039;t fit the bill, either, and it ends up reading as if he wrote 250 pages of a gunfight and then had everyone get shot or quit so he could take a nap.  My point is that the end of the Moss family wasn&#039;t an inherently bad choice, but the execution faltered after that decision was made.  A tight epilogue, like that at the end of Blood Meridian, could have done the trick better and elevated the whole.

Other complaints?

1.  Chigurgh&#039;s primary method of killing people is laughable, not terrifying.  Yes, it has obvious value as a comment on his attitude toward his victims, but, as is said in one of Hemingway&#039;s Nick Adams stories, as a symbol, it&#039;s just not practical.  If Chigurgh&#039;s supposed to be a Judge Holden figure, he better have me shaking in my existential boots, not chuckling like I&#039;m watching a bad slasher flick.

2. I felt for 250 pages of this book like I&#039;d read it before.  Robert Stone&#039;s Dog Soldiers covered this ground thirty years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, </p>
<p>The local library finally got this book in stock ($25! Who does McCarthy think he is?  Faulkner?  Melville?), so I am finally free to look at your blog again.  I agree with almost all of your evaluation, except your argument that the end of the Moss family so long before the end of the book was a bad structural decision (or do I misread you?).  Yes, the book falls apart after Llewelyn&#8217;s wife dies, but with that ending, it would have been just a potboiler.  Still, what McCarthy gives us doesn&#8217;t fit the bill, either, and it ends up reading as if he wrote 250 pages of a gunfight and then had everyone get shot or quit so he could take a nap.  My point is that the end of the Moss family wasn&#8217;t an inherently bad choice, but the execution faltered after that decision was made.  A tight epilogue, like that at the end of Blood Meridian, could have done the trick better and elevated the whole.</p>
<p>Other complaints?</p>
<p>1.  Chigurgh&#8217;s primary method of killing people is laughable, not terrifying.  Yes, it has obvious value as a comment on his attitude toward his victims, but, as is said in one of Hemingway&#8217;s Nick Adams stories, as a symbol, it&#8217;s just not practical.  If Chigurgh&#8217;s supposed to be a Judge Holden figure, he better have me shaking in my existential boots, not chuckling like I&#8217;m watching a bad slasher flick.</p>
<p>2. I felt for 250 pages of this book like I&#8217;d read it before.  Robert Stone&#8217;s Dog Soldiers covered this ground thirty years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

