I was watching CSPAN while giving Ella a bottle just now; they were showing John Kerry mingling with supporters somewhere in New Hampshire. He was clearly feeling under the weather, but nevertheless talked one on one with dozens of people, each with their own individual problems or comments. He posed for pictures. He answered questions. And it struck me: what’s this nonsense about him being “wooden?” Here he is, obviously exhausted, and he can still work a crowd with the best of them. Of _course_ he can: he wouldn’t have made it this far if he couldn’t.
This goes for everybody else, too. Kerry isn’t wooden. Gore wasn’t a robot. Dean isn’t angry, either, and Bush isn’t stupid. Heck, I saw Lieberman on CSPAN a few months ago doing the same sort of thing as Kerry, and even _he_ was impressive. They all do have their individual tics, their strengths and weaknesses, but if they didn’t have that weird ability to _connect_ to perfect strangers, they wouldn’t be in this business in the first place. We do all candidates a disservice by judging them by their performances in front of the bright lights, and by going along with the shorthand evaluations that a culture of sound bites inevitably creates. In a perfect world each citizen would be able to look each candidate in the eye; as it is, everyone should watch them mingle with the crowds on CSPAN. You’ll learn a lot.

3 comments
January 24, 2004 at 6:04 pm
Electrolite
A brief pause for mental calibration.
Nate Bruinooge of Polytropos makes an observation all political bloggers should probably tape to their computer monitors for the next…
January 25, 2004 at 6:44 pm
Gary Farber
Two things don’t help: a) a significant percentage of the population getting their primary coverage via Leno/Letterman/O’Brien, et al — really; and b) lazy, pack journalism that tags a candidate with a storyline — “Gore is a robotic embellishing liar,” “Bush is stupid and can’t speak English” and then both sets of contributors just look for examples to confirm their storylines. Repeat, wash, rinse, 5000 times.
Just yesterday Slate casually tossed off, again, that Gore had “lied about inventing the internet” and this morning Tim Russert said on Meet The Press that “Gore embellished by saying he started the Internet.” These pros really aren’t any better than an awful lot of bloggers, and less good than some. They’re lazy and get stories primarily from each other much of the time.
Yes, this ticks me off.
January 25, 2004 at 6:58 pm
nate
Good points, Gary.
I was about to include a snarky comment about your lack of updates to your own blog, but I poked by to see if you’d done anything lately. Holy cow! When it rains it pours.